I've been a Boglehead for a long time, although to be fair, I was a Bernsteinhead before I was ever a Boglehead. But I was on the Bogleheads forum before there was a Bogleheads forum, back when it existed as the largest forum at Morningstar.com called the Vanguard Diehards. I was one time the 8th most prolific poster on the forum and even so rank in the superlative xx despite putting 99% of my online efforts over the terminal decade hither at The White Coat Investor. I've attended a couple of national Bogleheads meetings, spoken at local Bogleheads meetings, been on the Bogleheads podcast, been censored, moderated and banned on the forum, written a chapter in a Bogleheads book, and read all three books. In a lot of ways, the origin of The White Glaze Investor was simply the adapting of the "Boglehead Bulletin" to physicians and other loftier-income professionals.

And so let me be very clear when I criticize my boyfriend Bogleheads that the amount of adept beingness done on the forum is several orders of magnitude larger than the amount of harm. But if you lot can't step dorsum and chuckle at yourself every now and then, you're probably wound a piddling bit too tight. And so today, let's pace back and look at some of the silly things that happen among Bogleheads, take a little fun, and maybe fifty-fifty learn something in the process.

="2″ link="wrBb4″ via="no" ]And then allow me be very clear when I criticize my beau Bogleheads that the corporeality of good being done on the forum is several orders of magnitude larger than the amount of harm.

Ten Boglehead Errors

Perhaps there are more than, but in relatively brusk guild I was able to come with x areas where I recollect many Bogleheads are missing the marker.

# i There is "Boglehead Consensus" on Every Topic

This is one of my personal favorites. Sometimes information technology shows upward as a poster asking "What exercise Bogleheads recall of……" or "What is the Bogleheads Doctrine on….?" But more than often it shows upwardly in the answers from someone who feels similar they speak for all Bogleheads. Well, there are over 91,000 Bogleheads and if the ratio of posters to lurkers is the same every bit on the WCI Forum, there are likely over a million people using the forum regularly. Needless to say, in that location is nobody who can really speak for the unabridged customs and there is actually very piddling that the vast majority of the community agrees on. Those principles are best summarized on the wiki:

  1. Develop a workable programme
  2. Invest early and often
  3. Never bear too much or too lilliputian risk
  4. Diversify
  5. Never endeavour to time the market
  6. Use index funds when possible
  7. Proceed costs low
  8. Minimize taxes
  9. Invest with simplicity
  10. Stay the grade

It'south pretty hard to argue with much of that, but y'all'll occasionally see someone arguing against numbers 5 and 6, merely that is nigh information technology. Otherwise, people pretty much agree. But beyond that? There is very picayune consensus virtually annihilation.

# ii The Three Fund Portfolio is Special

This is the classic dogma that isn't doctrine. It has been prevalent for years and seems to only be getting worse since Taylor published his volume. As I wrote in my mail "150 Portfolios Better Than Yours", there is nothing special about the three-fund portfolio (Usa Total Stock Market, Total International Stock Market, and Total Bail Market.) It isn't objectively better than a ii fund portfolio or a four fund portfolio. Full Bond Market Index Fund is not necessarily amend than the Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund.

Now, the three-fund portfolio is fine. It's reasonably unproblematic and quite diversified, unless you're into factor investing. Simply an investor who doesn't follow its prescription is hardly a Boglehead heretic. In fact, I suspect the vast majority of Bogleheads do Not use the three-fund portfolio, simply yous would never know it due to the song minority chanting in unison…."3 Fund….Three Fund….3 Fund…"

# three Optimizing Investments Is The Key to Wealth

The Bogleheads are very proficient at optimizing investments. They'll assist you pick the best funds out of your 401(k) line-up, do some taxation-loss harvesting, become your average expense ratio down, and salve some tax dollars. Just they sometimes miss the forest for the copse. When it comes to reaching your financial goals, optimizing your investments is more often than not not at the pinnacle of the listing, at to the lowest degree until the distribution phase.

When someone comes to the forum with an income of $25,000 a year and a $1,200 portfolio they need to be told that they demand to increase their income, non bandy their Target Retirement 2040 for a Life Strategy Moderate Fund. When someone comes to the forum making $100,000 and saving $v,000 a yr, they demand to be told that they should spend less and save more than, not tax loss harvest. Boosting income and increasing your savings charge per unit are dramatically more important steps, but are ignored far too often.

# four Run a risk Tolerance is Really Important and Static

Larry Swedroe is fond of saying that your portfolio needs to recognize your own individual demand, power, and want to take risk. Bogleheads have adopted that statement wholeheartedly and repeat it frequently with long discussions almost risk tolerance. At that place are two issues with risk tolerance that are far more nuanced than many Bogleheads recognize:

  1. It is essentially impossible to measure accurately until information technology matters most
  2. It is non static

Start, the all-time test of risk tolerance is what you really did in a bear market when y'all lost a substantial amount of coin. But all bear markets are not created equal. What you really desire to know is what you will practise in the worst acquit market you will ever see in your life. Unfortunately, past the time you become there, information technology is as well late to adapt your asset allocation to your take chances tolerance. All those "risk tolerance" surveys professionals and laymen alike use probably aren't worth the paper they are printed on every bit far as predicting actual behavior in marketplace downturns.

2d, hazard tolerance is not static. It has been clearly shown that our estimated run a risk tolerance is higher in bull markets than in bear markets. Plus, what really matters is your behavior, not your risk tolerance. Every bit Phil Demuth said,

Fifty-fifty if chance tolerance existed and could be measured accurately, why would information technology exist an important gene to consult when considering how to invest? Yous should invest in the way that has the greatest prospect to fulfill your investment goals. That might mean taking more than or less take chances than you would prefer. If you are a sensitive soul who can brook no paper losses, the solution is to get a grip, not to invest "safely" if that locks in running out of money when you are old.

bogleheadA lot of people demand to exist told to "get a grip" instead of having a long discussion about risk tolerance. I'thou just amazed to see people who take decided they could tolerate a 65/35 portfolio but non a lxx/xxx portfolio. Don't kid yourself. Those portfolios will perform almost exactly the same. If you tin't tolerate one, y'all almost surely won't be able to tolerate the other.

# v Expense Ratios Always Thing

I notice information technology hilarious to watch people try to reduce their overall mutual fund expense ratio by a ground point or two. It was particularly interesting to sentry those aforementioned people get flustered when Fidelity came out with index funds with a 0% expense ratio. As discussed nether # 1, price matters, and information technology matters a lot. But petty costs don't thing a lot. When costs get down to a certain level, other things affair more. For instance, with an index fund three things matter:

  1. What alphabetize
  2. How well the fund tracks it
  3. At what cost?

Once you go down below 10-20 footing points, # 1 and # two matter a whole lot more # 3.

# 6 Investing in Existent Estate Means 3 am Toilet Calls

One of the nearly bizarre things I've run across over the years is the battle between common fund investors and real estate investors. Each is convinced that the other school of thought is composed entirely of fools. The mutual fund investors are derided for their "paper assets" and the existent estate investors are told their investments are really "a second job." Nevertheless, I've simply run into likewise many real estate investors who know nothing about the importance of portfolio construction, hazard direction, minimizing costs, and diversification. I've likewise run into as well many mutual fund investors who don't know there are real estate investments exterior of managing single-family homes, think depreciation is always a bad thing, and can't believe that a real manor investment with an expected return of fifteen-xxx% could possibly exist.

Comprehensive Wealth Management for a simple, flat fee

Wise investors take advantage of the benefits of both schools of idea. Publicly traded REIT alphabetize funds are not the but viable existent estate investment. You lot can invest in real estate without getting 3 am toilet calls. Index funds are existent investments in real companies with existent profits, not "newspaper assets."

# seven Entrepreneurship is a Bad Idea

Along with real estate investing, any type of entrepreneurship is as well oft poo-pooed on the forum. Information technology may be that the forum attracts conservative investors who tend to have stable jobs in engineering firms, corporate America, or medicine. They are correct that nearly small businesses neglect in short club. However, there are plenty of examples correct on the forum of very successful entrepreneurs who end upwards with portfolios of $5M, $10M, or even $50M. Instead of merely telling people not to appoint in any sort of entrepreneurial pursuit, it would be better to provide communication about going nearly the process in a smart style, minimizing leverage and providing the longest possible runway, especially if it can be done initially on the side.

# viii Liquidity is Critical

Talking to some investors you would call up there was a loftier likelihood that they would need to liquidate their unabridged portfolio tomorrow. For a group that encourages a long-term perspective and avoids marketplace timing, you would think they would be a petty more open up to capitalizing on the illiquidity premium with at to the lowest degree some portion of their portfolio. I but cannot reconcile the demand to have 100% of a portfolio be liquid when one only needs about 4% a year from it. I have surveyed groups of docs and asked how much of their portfolio they would keep liquid if they were beingness paid significantly more for existence illiquid. Nearly respondents chose to place a bulk of the portfolio into illiquid investments! Certainly putting 10-25% of a portfolio into illiquid investments is not an insane motility.

# nine Doctor Bills Should E'er Be Negotiated Retroactively

The last couple of years an "anti-doctor" vibe seems to have crept onto the forum. Post afterward postal service in the "consumer problems" section seems to chronicle to a medical bill and how unfair it is. While I'll exist the first to acknowledge that our wellness intendance system (and especially how we pay for it) has serious problems, the repeated suggestions on the forum to not pay bills or demand discounts wear sparse. Guess what? Doctors are expensive. If the bill is accurate and your insurance company has paid its portion, then it's fourth dimension for you to pay your portion. If you don't similar the bargain you made with your insurance company or the deal the insurance company made with the doctor on your behalf, and then go to a new insurance company. But singling out physician bills over all other professions is not fair when they have already provided you lot the promised services.

# 10 Mr. Money Mustache and Dave Ramsey Are the Devil Incarnate

In one case or twice a calendar month in that location is a thread dealing with ane or the other of these two individuals. Rather than acknowledging the massive corporeality of good these 2 public figures have washed in the globe, posters nitpick the things they exercise not hold with and warn against ever reading annihilation these ii gentlemen have written or said.

I don't think there is Everyone in the fiscal world that I agree with on every indicate. And I think any reader or listener of mine that agrees with EVERYTHING I say probably needs to exercise more than reading. But that doesn't change the fact that at that place is a lot of wisdom coming out of both of their mouths. Take what you observe useful and leave the balance. The same applies to every advisor you ever listen to and volume you always read.

Equally I mentioned at the beginning, there are many Bogleheads who aren't holding on to any of these misguided beliefs. It is a very various community afterwards all with a variety of incomes, professions, genders, races, sexual orientations, and religions. But at that place are too many Bogleheads who are not only making these mistakes, just evangelizing them.

What exercise you recall? Annihilation else that Bogleheads frequently get wrong? Do you think these are valid criticisms? Annotate below!